[wacki]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you look at the last two reports. C02 levels have increased dramatically (at a greater rate then anyone would have projected) yet the IPCC's own projections for temperature have decreased dramatically.

[/ QUOTE ]

Source please.

[/ QUOTE ]

The IPCC. In 2001 they projected 2100 temperatures would be 2.4-10.8C higher. In 2006 the projections are now 1.1-6.4C higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm familiar with the IPCC reports. I was hoping you would point me to the think tank that makes this 'consensus debunking' argument. I have a hobby of documenting this stuff.

[ QUOTE ]
In the meantime we have had China and India grow to the point China is going to pass the USA as the largest source of CO2 within the next 10 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

And this is starting to look like an ideology card. I suspect this is why you are rejecting 99% of the scientific community. If you want to discuss science then good for you. However, political arguments belong in the political forum. What matters in the global warming scenario is not "he's polluting more than I am" child-like/ideology arguments but what the total global emissions are.