Re: shotgun
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fgators should just post a pokerev graph for his last 200k hands. That would solve everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
No it wouldn't.
[/ QUOTE ]
So posting the all-in graph wouldn't show whether he's truly running bad or not?
[/ QUOTE ]
Not neccessarily because how do you differentiate between coolers and bad play? He could have a tonne of set under sets, flush under flush, KKvAA etc and yet it would look like he is running normal. It would give us a fairly good idea I guess though
[/ QUOTE ]
No, the all-in graph just calculates his actual EV when all the money went in and compares it to what it theoretically should be.
So say he goes AI as an 80% favourite 10 times for a $400 pot. He should have made $1600. Well it will calculate what he actually made and make a graph based on that.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes I know that. But that graph could show him running well/as expected, but he could still be running horribly in the grand scheme of things because of gross coolers ete which will make all 3 lines plummet.
[/ QUOTE ]
Pretty sure those coolers will even out after a couple hundred thousand hands.
Fgators, it's been said a million times, but you just aren't good at poker. You have down the basic concepts of value betting and pot control etc., but you have tons of other leaks that decent players will exploit and have been for the past year.
Running bad is a really poor excuse for your results over such a large sample. You can't possibly run a few ptbb below expectation over the million or two hands you've played lifetime.
But quitting poker is something you definitely need to do, you got that right.
|