Re: Rank these past NBA Teams
Harper was damaged goods when he came to Chicago, and not the 20ppg guy he was before.
Remember, in that first year, he was averaging his awesome 6.9ppg even BEFORE Jordan came back.
You want to rank Kerr higher than Paxon because he did one thing well. One. Paxson was superior in every aspect of the game except playing HORSE.
Yet, you like Harper based on the fact that he "could have" scored much more, which really isn't true at that stage of his career (he only averaged 11pg after everyone got shopped out of town and his mpg went up). He played better defense, which I grant, but his offensive game wasn't very good anymore due to his knees being shot. His outside shot was supsect (which hurt the offense tremendously - which you know otherwise you wouldn't like Kerr so much), he had trouble creating at all.
I'd rank them like this:
Paxson > Harper >> Kerr > Hodges
Paxson is the only one who wasn't a liability at one end or the other.
|