[ClarkNasty]

Dude, neither was ever a major offensive threat. Kerr never averaged double digit ppg, Pax did only once or twice I think. Paxson was far more involved in the offense, he could drive, handle the ball, and most importantly, wasn't a complete and utter liability on the defensive end.

By comparison, as I mentioned before, Harper played better D but was a joke on offense.

I maintain his true comparison is Hodges, who was slightly less useless on D, and not quite as good a shooter.

Regardless, we're talking about 4 players who between them averaged about 8ppg during relevant Bulls years. I think Paxson was without a doubt the best of the group, and ignoring Kerr's total inadequacy on defense is to overlook a serious deficiency.