[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
if it cannot be viewed as factual, than one has gaps in their ability to think critically

[/ QUOTE ]

That was a quote from the Pulitzer panel's determination of the book as a result of their extensive research into the sources cited.

I'll let them know some guy on the interwebs thinks they have gaps in their ability to think critically, since they are basing it on their own extensive research into the book, instead of taking the two authors words at face value, based on the hearsay gleaned from less than credible sources who in many cases have recanted or denied the allegations made in the book.

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]