[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Dude, RedBean, how could you possibly have been so negligent as to forget about "the little things?"

[/ QUOTE ]

I notice, once again, someone glossing over stuff and trying to identify one point where they can try to twist a semantic argument to discredit the rest of what was said


[/ QUOTE ]

What is he glossing over?

You assert the evidence against Bonds to be:

1. "what he said"
2. "his numbers"
3. "his pictures"
4. "the little things"

I'll engage in intelligent, rational debate about all 4 of these items until I'm blue in the face, if you'd like, but to be honest the sarcasm dripping from Vhawk's reply to you was due to the fact that such debate probably isn't possible by the mere fact that you are pointing to numbers and pictures as evidence of steroid use.

[/ QUOTE ]

what??????????????

you look at those numbers and those pictures combined with Barry's personal attitude and the close relationships he had with dopers, yet don't see that as very compelling evidence of performance enhancement product use above and beyond OTC use???????????

hahahahhahahahahha
hahahhahahahahhahah
rofl


hahahahahhahahah

EDIT: notice everyone how i've used the tactic largely adopted by some people in the long-going Barry saga of reducing the opposing view by laughing at it as it doesn't even merit consideration.