Re: Absolute Cheating
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, just to check then, are 20 and 16 still relatively high? Because that sounds a lot different to infinite.
[/ QUOTE ]
The only reason there was one hand sample where the River AF was infinite was because he had a 100 hand stretch where he never called on the river, and since River A/F essentially is dividing the number of raises on the river by the number of calls, you get a divide by zero error, which the pokertracker software interprets as infinity. A river aggression factor of 20 is still insane over 400 hands, while at the same time winning over 200 ptbb per 100. This is basically statistically impossible, the odds are beyond any statistical outlier. I guarantee you every player here could look at their entire hand history range, and nowhere would they find a hand history range where they were winning over 200 ptbb/100 over 400 hands while simultaneously having a River AF of over 10.
[/ QUOTE ]
But is he playing *perfect* poker on the river as opposed to near perfect? The only reason I can see for his river AF to be finite while still playing perfectly would be because he cannot raise an opponent's all-in bet (or capped bet as it applies) when he holds the best hand.
Or maybe I am missing something obvious and there is another reason for the non-infinite river AF.
|