Re: Absolute Cheating
I would add the bolded part for more clarity:
[ QUOTE ]
From examining the data, one thing stood out above all others. On the last round of betting (after all the cards had been dealt out and determination of the winning and losing hand is no longer subject to chance), the suspicious accounts always raised or folded - they never ever simply called a bet. While some players with aggressive playing styles will often raise or fold, it is unheard of to *never* call. The experts asked themselves - in what circumstances would it make sense to always raise or fold, and never to call. The clear answer is that if you know your opponents' cards, then clearly you should raise (if you have the best hand) or fold (if you do not). Calling never makes sense if you are 100% sure of whether you have the best hand. For normal players who do not know what cards their opponents hold, calling is often clearly the best option when you think you may have the best hand, but you are not sure.
[/ QUOTE ]
Also, if we do get a pro to weigh in with a quote, it should be someone who's not affiliated with a competitor of Absolute.
|