Re: Macro Evolution Epihpanypy.
[ QUOTE ]
He states that Micro evolution does and is proven to exist but man evolving from a rock is just ridiculous.
[/ QUOTE ]
if only there was a barrier that stopped micro-evolution from adding up to what we call macro-evolution.
if anyone would like to propose one...I'm sure there would be plenty of people willing to hear about it.
[ QUOTE ]
but all i can really think of now is that there is no missing link. WAIT!
[/ QUOTE ]
if we found the "missing link"...there would be 2 more to find [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]..and if we found those...you see where I'm going?
[ QUOTE ]
I know theres not meant to be 1 but when we evolved from the apes and then evolved again killing the original 'evolvees' over and over again, (Ie we evolve into caveman then neanderthal so kill caveman.) why didnt we ever kill the original apes.
[/ QUOTE ]
errr...evolution is a branching...your "original apes" are NOT modern apes...they are the common ancestor of both humans and modern apes.
some modern apes may closely resemble that ancestor and give insight into that common ancestor...but they have had just as much time to evolve as humans have....the reason that they still resemble that modern ancestor is that they fill a particular niche...and they are evolved to exploit that niche to the best of their ability (actually, only to a better ability than their competitors)
|