Re: help on proving poker is not about luck
You need to present the known formulas that show that if you play this many hands the probability of you winning if you are this or that much a better player than your opponents on average is X. That will prove that the luck factor is more or less not dominating.
The other thing you need to prove is that there's enough skill in poker. You need to present the skill factors and show that they are significant, also proving that the opponents on average (weighted average) are that much worse than you are.
Presenting your PT stats helps.
If the one who you are trying to prove it to has no brain, you will fail. If the other has a brain, there is more or less a possibility that he would already understand.
|