Re: Poker In Colorado?
[ QUOTE ]
there is a gross conflict of interest in this thread.
[ QUOTE ]
alright. let me take a stab at this math as I understand it.
let the game be beatable at a winrate of x, where x = # of big bets/hour.
since the rake is capped at ~$7/pot (is this 10%?), let's assume an average rake of $5 per pot/no flop no drop.
assuming a dealing rate of 35 hands/hour, that's $175 coming out of circulation every hour out of $1750 total that's exchanging hands every hour.
although you can't calculate the true rake you are paying without your pots won/pots lost ratio, i highly doubt this game can be beaten; if it can, it's probably at 10bb/hour or more.
by all means, if there's someone out there with more math tricks, please correct me.
[/ QUOTE ]
the assumed numbers Furyion21 uses are on the conservative side.
[/ QUOTE ]
RR does this conservative math sound correct to you or not.please give reasons for your point of view.you have said and reiterated the poitnt that "these games are easily beatable". you have provided exactly zero evidence for your point of view.other than something that read like"um...im a mod and a gilpen floor who has played and won 5 times and know this to bet true...take my word for it.my intelect combined with my sample size are profound factual evidence BSBSBSBSBSProGilpenThisProGilpenThat..........."
|