[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
3. For those who don’t play enough to even qualify for rakeback it doesn’t matter.

[/ QUOTE ]
Obtaining rakeback at FT is not a matter of volume.

There is a minimum to qualify (not sure exact amount - something like you might have to have a minimum $5
in rakeback. Small players but there are lots of them

[ QUOTE ]
4. For a minority it is a bit of a grey area as to what is best.

[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. I suspect that for almost all players who have access to rakeback and are playing decent volumes (like, 5 or 10 hours a week quoted by MB) it is a marginal decision either way.

Does not a marginal decision mean it is a grey area then?