Re: The myth of PS rakeback
[ QUOTE ]
1. For many people (primarily high volume SN and SNE’s and those who cannot receive FTP rakeback) the VIP/FPP system on Stars is superior.
[/ QUOTE ]
Probably.
[quot]2. For the remaining people (who receive rakeback) FTP is financially superior.
[/ QUOTE ]
Not nessecarily. Some will be, some won't be.
[ QUOTE ]
3. For those who don’t play enough to even qualify for rakeback it doesn’t matter.
[/ QUOTE ]
Obtaining rakeback at FT is not a matter of volume.
[ QUOTE ]
4. For a minority it is a bit of a grey area as to what is best.
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. I suspect that for almost all players who have access to rakeback and are playing decent volumes (like, 5 or 10 hours a week quoted by MB) it is a marginal decision either way.
If you're not makign those volumes, you're only talking $5 or $10 a week.
[ QUOTE ]
5. RB or FPP’s is not the only consideration in deciding where to play.
[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.
[ QUOTE ]
I also hope for world peace and goodwill to all men.
[/ QUOTE ]
Me too.
|