View Single Post
  #134  
Old 09-11-2007, 03:50 AM
Josem Josem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 4,780
Default Re: The myth of PS rakeback

[ QUOTE ]
1. For many people (primarily high volume SN and SNE’s and those who cannot receive FTP rakeback) the VIP/FPP system on Stars is superior.

[/ QUOTE ]
Probably.

[quot]2. For the remaining people (who receive rakeback) FTP is financially superior.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not nessecarily. Some will be, some won't be.

[ QUOTE ]
3. For those who don’t play enough to even qualify for rakeback it doesn’t matter.

[/ QUOTE ]
Obtaining rakeback at FT is not a matter of volume.

[ QUOTE ]
4. For a minority it is a bit of a grey area as to what is best.

[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. I suspect that for almost all players who have access to rakeback and are playing decent volumes (like, 5 or 10 hours a week quoted by MB) it is a marginal decision either way.

If you're not makign those volumes, you're only talking $5 or $10 a week.

[ QUOTE ]
5. RB or FPP’s is not the only consideration in deciding where to play.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed.

[ QUOTE ]
I also hope for world peace and goodwill to all men.

[/ QUOTE ]
Me too.
Reply With Quote