[towery]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, why should the short stack be DQ'd? Cause someone checked the nuts behind him? This is pathetic if the short stack gets DQ'd for someone else's play who has 10% of him.

[/ QUOTE ]
???? Because they are both cheating? DUCY?



[/ QUOTE ]

no, i dont see why. please explain.

the actions benefit the short stack but that doesnt mean the short stack had anything to do w/ it.

so if i wanted to DQ ivey from the WSOP, i could check the nuts against him and he'd be out? brilliant.

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't a criminal trial where we need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the shortstack is indeed innocent then he is paying a price for being staked by a dubious individual.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you don't need proof beyond reasonable doubt, but I am pretty sure every tournament director in the world disagrees with you.