Re: More Bonds
[ QUOTE ]
The evidence is certainly by no means "thin".
[/ QUOTE ]
I'd say it's less than thin, considering the first two grand juries failed to indict citing "lack of evidence to go to trial", and the third grand jury has yet to produce even an indictment.
[ QUOTE ]
The reason reporting is supposedly biased against Bonds is obv because he is the #1 name connected with steroid use and due to his previous media-unfriendly history.
[/ QUOTE ]
Now we're getting some where.
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really think the media should be focusing more on Hank Aaron's admitted greenie use?
[/ QUOTE ]
Do you think they should never, ever mention it, while at the same time labeling him the "symbol of doing it clean"?
Because that is what SI did.
[ QUOTE ]
would it be fair to say that his position is that Barry didn't take steroids?
[/ QUOTE ]
That would be unfair, considering it isn't my position.
My position is that I reserve judgement until I see what both sides have to say, you know, when all the evidence comes out, instead of basing my opinion on the speculation of a handful of biased sportswriters.
|