Re: More Bonds
The evidence is certainly by no means "thin". The reason reporting is supposedly biased against Bonds is obv because he is the #1 name connected with steroid use and due to his previous media-unfriendly history. Do you really think the media should be focusing more on Hank Aaron's admitted greenie use? And if he's continually telling us that "evidence" is overblown or outright made up, would it be fair to say that his position is that Barry didn't take steroids? Seems pretty idiotic to say, yes, he took steroids, but all the evidence is a lie and doesn't prove it.
|