[jjshabado]

Dynacraze seems to have some Phil Laak issues... Did you spend all day thinking about Phil Laak?

1. If he were a nit and everyone knew it, he should be able to make successful bluffs.

2. He wasn't arguing about the verbal declaration being binding. He asked if the chips were out first (in which case the verbal declaration is meaningless). Sure it was kind of nitty, but its not an angleshoot to call a player on breaking the rules. In this case when everybody said he said 10K first, he backed off.

3. Meh.

4. Yeah, no poker player ever complains about missing a hand... I swear if I could change one thing in the poker world it would be outlawing the new catch phrase of "one time".

5. I think it was a bad fold. I don't think its bad that he'll never make a call like Matusows. That was pretty bad.