Re: A Question I got via PM
[ QUOTE ]
Cause and effect.
[/ QUOTE ]
No, it's not cause and effect, it's the same thing.
[ QUOTE ]
Plenty, would you mind explaining what they've got to do with this though?
[/ QUOTE ]
The gains of trade (i.e. voluntary transaction) can be distributed very unevenly which can be considered more or less just and fair.
Anyways what I'm saying is that you can't run around and claim something to be fair or just when you're using a very narrow definition of justice or fairness and even fail to specify it.
It's not like there's a generally accepted definition of justice and fairness. For instance the understanding of Rawls and Nozick/Hayek regarding justice and fairness are like miles apart yet neither is "wrong".
|