[MicroBob]

looking at it as 'every 1.4 hands' being raked is actually slightly confusing to me...but I think I get your drift.

Looks like you are playing 6-max (since you are assuming 100 hds/hr...I assume closer to 95, but whatever...100/hr makes the calculations easier).


I usually go by something like:
3/6 6-max = about 50% raked
5/10 6-max = about 70-72% raked


so, 4 tables of 3/6 = 200 hds an hour
2 tables of 5/10 = 142 hds an hour


Note - I think slightly fewer hands get raked at 3/6 then what you are speculating. But it's all about table-selection and how tight you might be playing, etc.

Regardless, our calcs are pretty much the same and it's pretty clear that 4-tabling 3/6 would do it faster than 2-tabling 5/10.

However, 3-tabling 5/10 would likely go about the same as (or perhaps a little faster) 4-tabling 3/6.