[tangled]

[/ QUOTE ]"... if he can't take it he shouldn't play."

"...my sole intent is to take your money. That's the idea."

[/ QUOTE ]

These statements contradict: If your “sole intent “ is to “take his money“, then what difference does it make to you if he shouldn’t play because he “can’t take it.”. The first requirement that must be met to take a person’s money at a poker table - is to get them TO the poker table, not to find reasons why they shouldn’t be at the poker table.

Also, ridiculing a person just because they don’t play cards as well as you do is not evidence of someone that has grown up. It is evidence of the opposite.

But what I really don’t understand is that if you felt the way you do, then why didn’t you take the “moron” up on his invitation and meet him in the parking lot and teach him a lesson or two about growing up? Why are you here whining to us? Perhaps, could it be because he would have kicked your butt? Which begs the question - who really is the moron: The person who doesn’t play poker well, or the wussy that ridicules the play of the person who can kick their butt?