[CallMeIshmael]

I dont agree with Phil's stance on the issue, but I think he has a fair point here.

I think a rule that censors the claim that homosexuality is a perversion hurts the debate on this issue in a way that other, more sensible, censoring would not. Beyond that, Sklansky himself called it a perversion once, so its kind odd. (though, I have to say, iron does a great job overall, imo)


EDIT: though, I guess if you wanted to point it out, I would agree that his specific phrasing of the comment was part of the problem, and, if that was the reason for the censor, I think it makes more sense.