[APerfect10]

[ QUOTE ]
I just think that the ADVANCED tool in this whole thing is the large software (be it PT, HM, PO) or whatever, and not the tracking/buddy software. The sorting capabilities are best done by the larger software with the information at it's disposal and then transfered to tracking software as easily as possible (text file or whatever). Spade Eye for example has sorting by VPIP PFR and AGG factor and that's it, rediculous with the information on hand [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Just seems so easy for the bigger software to spit out a list of carefully selected names, and then you say to the tracking software "find them".

[/ QUOTE ]

To be honest, I'm not that familiar with Spade Eye as I do not use it. I think I tried it once when they first launched but didnt find it useful for my needs. Anyways, I am not understanding the problem. The easiest way for third party software is to query the database where all of the information is located rather then be reliant on us generating some report for them. Maybe someone more familiar with SE can chime in or explain the problem to me...

Best regards,

APerfect10