[olieovie]

Wow, you're not much of a statistician if you think that just because one subset of data doesn't meet a 95% confidence interval that you conclude a site is rigged. Are you seriously suggesting that if any two-card hand within a 10K hand set of data needs to be within 2 sigmas of its expected occurence value otherwise the site is rigged?

You may know what a confidence interval is, but I don't think you know how to apply it. There as to be a methodology to your reasoning based on the type of problem you are investigating. Otherwise, someone else can just say "Fine, I apply a 99% confidence interval and my hypothesis that the site is random is supported so STFU."