Re: \"riggedpoker.com - 100% rigging guaranteed\"
[ QUOTE ]
Ok Josem, if you say so....
But it's still data! Show me the other 99% of AA's that are closer than 2.37 sigma and I will be happy to agree.
[/ QUOTE ]
If sciolist (sp?) posted the results of all 169 hands, i'm confident they'd fit within the expected framework.
[ QUOTE ]
Data
* Rejection of "bad" data on arbitrary grounds, instead of according to previously stated or generally agreed criteria.
* Rejection of "outliers" on statistical grounds that fail to take into account important information that could be derived from wild observations as described by Kruskal.
[/ QUOTE ]
Right... your analysis, which only takes into account the AA, rejects the data for hands 22-KK.
Doesn't this prove the failure of your own analysis? Or are you trying to make some other point here? That quote is exactly what i am trying to say (although they use much more complicated terminology than I have)
I felt I was quite clear in saying that the failure of your analysis was because you focused on only one hand rather than the 13 hands that we have been provided with.
|