[realjaydub]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
realjaydub, why haven't you addressed my question on why they would rig a tournament hand (without a one word answer) and my comment that I've never personally had a downswing after withdrawing on any of the multiple sites I've played on?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well count yourself lucky.

Why would they? Give the money to the fish so they will keep playing. Better players will take more beats and it evens out the money so they can retain rake from x number of people instead of y number of people...x > y

ducy?

[/ QUOTE ]
Count myself lucky? Over 240,000 hands I've played... and it's luck that I'm not doomswitched on any site I've played on? That's a pretty weak explanation. Your whole argument is that doomswitches/rigged sites take away the luck from poker so that good players lose or at least lose more than they would in a non-rigged game.

Also, why is it that the biggest winners on this site (not $ wise, but at the stakes they play at) are very good players who don't believe it's rigged, not total donkeys?

[/ QUOTE ]


Then it should be easy to show me proof now wouldn't idiot?

It's funny how the two or three retards here are getting so worked up about me saying there's a chance the rng is flawed.

Why are you so defensive???? Sounds like I might be on to something.

Oh btw, lilholdem the gansta tard....he one of their "bigger winners" and he belives it's rigged.