Re: The And and the Blade of Grass
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, I think Dawkins has always been pretty careful about this
[/ QUOTE ]
Why is it logical and rational to look at nature, see apparent purpose and design, and conclude non-design, and irrational to look at nature, see apparent purpose and design, and conclude design. That's the big gap of logic in people like Dawkins.
[/ QUOTE ]
Because "purpose" is the wrong word for it. Stop equivocating.
You make your position many times weaker by being willfully ignorant of the arguments against it. Or, you know you are conflating all of these terms when you post, which makes you dishonest. Not sure which is worse.
|