Re: Talking Smack
Whats more disturbing is Wacki's out and out lies of late. For a long time he seemed like a well meaning advocate of his perception of the science, even if his confidence in the models was misplaced. He's been caught in too many inaccuracies to give him the benefit of the doubt any longer. I still give Phil the benefit of the doubt. He's well reasoned on other topics, and while it may seem he is parrotting Wacki, they are relying on the same science, so it would be a surprise if he didn't sound the same. At least he hasn't been caught in such outrageous misstatements.
|