[tuckercat]

[ QUOTE ]
2) discussing proper counterstrategies against particular shortstackers is detrimental to the end of taking their money? lol, what.

[/ QUOTE ]

discussing counter strategies against a particular shortstacker or group of shortstackers is in their best interest... is it not? i mean, if we sit here discuss and publicly disseminate information and thoughts on how to neutralize this particular player, it's only going to give them access to that valuable information... is it not? i mean suppose you are one of the donks in question, all of sudden you come onto this forum only to see that a bunch of guys who are far superior players than you having just posted a bunch of strategies and ideas on how to totally render you ineffective...short of absolute luckboxing. aren't you going to take that free information and apply it to your game?...and (however unlikely) adapt and evolve? i mean... why would we want to publicly put out information that could potentially help these clowns and worse yet potentially dry up a vast and bountifully lake of easy money? again, this is just imo... but i don't see the benefit to it all, especially since playing against shortstackers is easy. i think we would all agree, that short of luckboxing, a shortstacker/ratholer will never have an edge vs. a 2p2er or decent regular... so where's the payoff to discussing how to further pumble an already weak opponent?