[luckychancer]

[ QUOTE ]
Op claims to have been dealt hands he couldn't have been dealt and run bad for a period of time that couldn't be simply "running bad." He is, it appears, delusional with respect to this limited issue. [ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

So I ask you: who is actually helping OP? Those that are confronting him with facts, or those that are saying sorry buddy sucks to run bad for a half million hands.........

I for one would rather someone inform me if i was hallucinating, rather than just smiling and playing along.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is fair comment and should be heeded by the OP. The next step would be to take a look and ask why he is losing in a more conventional poker sense that applies to himself. Obviously this is not a question the OP has sufficiently addressed if he is still mired in the 'I'm so unlucky' rut.

It's too easy to wave your e penis about and say ' I'm better than you' then insert a smartassed put down of your choice. Obviously after 500k hand of losing poker many on this thread should know the above without having to state it in such a sickeningly arrogant manner.

Looking foreward to the statistical analysis here.
Should be interesting and maybe useful.