[antisocialgrace]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
gee what happened to the stats you aces at poker stars were so keen to show up the OP with?

Did you discover anomalies which can't be explained? phenomena which can't be comprehended? aberrations there's no accounting for? deviations that defy understanding?

You seemed so eager to set the record straight, I'm just wondering why it hasn't happened?

[/ QUOTE ]
This post ^^^ isnt valid until this time tomorrow night. Even then i don think its fair to the "aces at poker stars" as you put it, its not like they live to post here at 2+2! I am sure they have better things to do besides satisfying your curiosity on something that really just doesnt MATTER... oh and this surely isnt the first such analysis that has been done on Stars HHs, i am not with Stars but i am SURE they have performed such analysis on a MUCH wider sample than this little 500k on one person. Not to mention the third party folks they pay to do so. So i'm pretty sure we wont be seeing any "phenomena which can't be comprehended".

Earlier when you said [ QUOTE ]
Nevermind. Inadmissable, chain of custody.

[/ QUOTE ] were you trying to say that we shouldn't believe what sciolist posts because of the data's "chain of custody"?

[/ QUOTE ]

If the site were rigged it would be simple for them to cook the books and then pawn it off to a poker tracker bug when he posts his real stats. not saying they'd do that just that they could.

have you ever lost set over set five times (four on flops) in one day or flush over flush five times in a row? I have. Guess where ..