[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
your argument has many many holes in it. the biggest few are:


[/ QUOTE ]

It's not an argument.

I was simply saying I was amazed at how many folks are blindly following everything in this book as gospel truth and absolute fact. Especially considering the book hasn't even been released.


[ QUOTE ]

In addition, his performance increased at a huge clip once he started taking steroids/getting bigger.


[/ QUOTE ]

Let's say I were going to write a libelous book saying Bonds was a doper. Naturally, I would fit my alleged timeline to fit his increase in production.

Alex Sanchez definitavely tested positive for steriods. Has the same statistical analysis been done on his career, and were the same differences seen?

[ QUOTE ]

sorry, but if you don't think Bonds was juicing, you're an idiot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I do think he juiced. My only point is that me thinking it, and you thinking it, and two guys writing a book that think it, doesn't necessarily make it a fact.

It makes for good book sales, and it makes people who hate Bonds feel good.

The only absolute facts are he has never tested positive, has not convicted of any crime, nor breaking any MLB rule.