[jafeather]

In response to Lorenza's post:

[ QUOTE ]
A)Tell me one site which has a worse software.

B)If the software wouldn't be that bad, traffic would have been better than Stars or FT.
C)Who wouldn't have played rakefree with a first class software.

D)Jay Leno once said in his show, let GM's or Ford's CEO drive around the block in a Honda or Toyota and they will know why they have a deficit.

E)With this software WSEX can't succeed, either they join a Network or they remodel their software from ground zero.

F)It's a fact.

[/ QUOTE ]

This response does nothing to suggest anything. I don't understand what good anyone gets from "waaaahhhhh it needs fixed" posts, without any suggestions about what's specifically wrong or how to improve it. Nonetheless, I will attempt to address your mostly pointless issues.

A) Again, this is a total matter of opinion. IMHO, wpex is not the worst software. I play some on sportsbook.com, and IMO their software is way, way worse and is not the only one.

B) I have no idea where you get this from. This is just a random thought based on nothing remotely tangible.

C) People who must have HUDs. People who must play on sites that allow more than 4-tabling. People who don't want to jump through hoops to get money on a site. People who don't want to wait forever for a check. Fish who don't understand the importance of no-rake.

Policy is a larger reason people do not play than software...again imo.

D) Again....do you really think wpex doesn't know what the other sites software is like?

E) There are many reasons WPEX may or may not succeed, software is just a piece of the much larger puzzle.

F) It is not a fact. It is an opinion.