[ASPoker8]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But, he obviously must play good.

[/ QUOTE ]

What? No.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're disputing that he "obviously must play good?"

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Just because he has results does not mean he obviously plays good. I am disputing that for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dunno dude. i think this attitude is a common trend amongst pros who think they are really good. not that they are wrong, but because they think so highly of their own play, they think that everyone that plays differently is "terrible." and the fact of the matter is, the possibility that lilholdem has simply been "running good" over all this time is miniscule to the point of implausibility. he is almost certainly a significantly winning player. he might have leaks, sure, but that doesn't make him bad. imo, "good" in poker should mean someone that beats the game -- something the overwhelming majority of players cannot do.

[/ QUOTE ]
agreed