Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
Flop 3-bet was expert. Also, doesnt the aggressive-looking flop 3bet always mean overs?
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't have a problem with her 3-betting, hell I've done that before... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I put her on 1 or 2 overs with the insta-aggressive 3-bet. It was pretty clear to me that the way to maximize my hand was to just call the 3 and c/r the turn. Especially when the K hit, that's enough of an overcard for her to bet.
On the river I debated, because I thought she could legitimately have AA here and QT lurked around in the dark corner of my mind, but I figured some Ax two pair was a more likely hand (it looks like I have KJ/K4/etc.).
But as someone pointed out, I really can't fold to a 4-bet, so am I 2/3 sure I have her beat?
No, no flush draw on flop. Are you kidding? I would 4-town any flop flush draw.
|