[disjunction]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, it's probably variance. But if one were to look for reasons, it could be the fact that he makes videos of himself playing and gives his opponents a feel for how he thinks.

[/ QUOTE ]

He specifically addressed this by basically saying he changes his reraising range thus isn't giving anything away. I'm pretty sure many internet pros have signed up for some insight.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't subscribe to cardrunners, but I've watched a few videos on stoxpoker and that's my basis for comparison. Unless he's perfect, there are holes in his thought processes. The thing about having holes in your thought processes is, you don't know what they are. But someone else listening can immediately say "that's flawed reasoning".

As for ranges, fine, he randomizes his own ranges. Does he narrate? How about the ranges he assigns to his opponents? Wouldn't it be nice to know what triggers him to assign you a range? What things he notes and doesn't note?

Meh, what do I know though. It sounds like he's lost a lot of this to Ivey anyway and Ivey probably couldn't care less.