View Single Post
  #45  
Old 07-23-2007, 07:55 AM
teddyFBI teddyFBI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Swapping only amounts > 1K
Posts: 3,592
Default Re: My Report on shortstacking bots NL500-NL2000

Yes, to all you spanish posters here who claim to be involved in this "ring", you still haven't answered the most important issues brought up in this thread. Of course you're fully within your rights to use a short-stacking "system" -- it's annoying for real players and it ruins the games, but you're not breaking any rule if it really is just actual people sitting around employing the system.

But you have, at every turn, sidestepped the very damning evidence that roblin posted, suggesting that many of the processes are AUTOMATED. That would clearly be prohibited, a,d would very much justify the wrath that members of this forum are casting upon you. You need to address the sit-in, sit-out evidence, which seems to clearly indicate that it's an AUTOMATED / computer-generated sequence. You might think that automating just THAT part of the game is OK, since it's not actual gameplay, but you won't find a single poster here who would agree with that. ANY automation classifies you as a bot. If your system is so simple and successful, you shouldn't have to automated any process. SO what do you have to say about this issue?
Reply With Quote