[ QUOTE ]
slick,
Standard response I expect from you. Funny how I ask for facts and your provide a wikipedia quote pasted all over the internet.
I read that drivel you posted earlier. So someone taking this:
http://www.1stallnutrition.com/nandrosol.html should be allowed while it is essentially the exact same thing as
http://www.silownia.net/img/deca_durabolin.jpg
Please back up your claim. Where is the study and where are the peer reviews? Or you can continue to attack me and say things like, "LOL. I'm a wikipedia expert. I can't provide the studies cause they don't exist. Or because the 'hard cardio' that our wikipedia friend so expertly describes isn't what Skerk was doing and it'll blast holes in my argument, so instead I'll claim ignorance."
[/ QUOTE ]
I posted the wikipedia quote because it was short the and excerpts from other papers that I posted earlier were apparently too difficult for you to read. The burden of production is now on you. I've linked to several studies that support my position, while you have produced nothing.
And you're not even being intellectually honest when you're accusing me of referring to study that does not even exist. The same study that the wikipedia quote referred has been cited in several other locations. Copyright law is a bitch.
To boil things down for into simple terms since your reading comprehension seems to be lacking: The studies indicate that it is possible for someone to test positive for nandrolone without ingesting nadrolone or obvious precursors like that stuff you just linked to. Kinda like how someone can test positive for morphine by eating poppy seeds.