[Akimka]

I think very major thing is missed here: what is the difference between computer that execute simple algorithm (and I am pretty sure that all this strategy can be written on single page of paper) and human that follow such strategy?
Anyway number is bot instances is limited by number of tables allowed and it's impossible to multiply number of bout in infinite so this advantage of computerized bots is not applicable. But with human bots we have major advantage - human play is allowed as opposed to computer play so if these people can prove that thay are nor computers poker site will allow them to play.

So what's conclusion about this? There is no point to discuss is these playes made from bone and flesh or from silicon because there is no difference. If Raul would not so generous with friends and hired army of unskilled labourers instead for $4/hour that would be a greater problem because all prima tables would be infested with bots very soo. Think about it.

So I am 100% certain that we need to demand all poker sites to raise minimum buyin to 50 and even better to 100BB instead of trying to see difference between bots.
I think that's should be a real goal for us.