Re: 30/60 QTs
[ QUOTE ]
The responses to this thread were pretty much what I expected them to be. I'm quite frustrated by that.
The Button had 6 9 and UTG's Q-high took the pot. I think both players played this hand pretty thoughtfully
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So Jason had to twist some details to make this hand postable, but it hardly matters. I was the button and I played this hand poorly. I should have bet the flop and since I didn't I should have just not tried to make a play for such a small pot. But when the UTG player checkraised the turn I think I played the hand great. I did not bet the river because the river was a heart, I checked behind and he won with a flush. I told him I had Ace high. His turn checkraise is abysmal.
[/ QUOTE ]
I go away to FW's for a couple of days and come back to fine out this thread has taken a strange twist.
This is just great. You think both players played the hand thoughtfully, then we find out that you made up the river action and a button hand that UTG could beat. Do you really think that it is highly likely that DD would have bet the turn with total dust, knowing that in a game like this other A's or PP's better than 4's will likely call, given the action so far?
|