[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fixed.
[/ QUOTE ]
How is such absurdly obvious cherry picking "fixed?" Please provide a chart that includes all the other decades in between and a few more from before and I'll considering it "fixed." Although even then I would question why they're doing "5 to 5" instead of a standard decade. Hell these aren't even decades but 11 years. Weird...
The fact that you take cherry picked non-useful crap like this and call it "evidence" is why I have such a hard time taking you (and the global warming community as a whole) seriously. Every damned time people quote me statistics it's statistically insignificant cherry picking.
[/ QUOTE ]
That table is from the American Meteorological Society. The raw data is in the links of the image I provided. Feel free to make your own graphs just make sure they are at the same points of the oscillation. If you can prove this paper was cherry picking then you should be able to get your name in some scientific journal.