Re: To answer your hypothetical question, try ACLU v Gonzales.
[ QUOTE ]
(Permafrost, I would be shocked if the Regs turn out to say, (a) Sports betting violates the Wire Act, therefore no deposits are okay, but (b) deposits from these 39 States are okay while deposits from these 11 States are not okay for poker. That would be an insanely well-tailored regulation, and permissible under the Act.)
[/ QUOTE ]
Milton, you are correct, insanly well taylored, but it is what I would like to see initially and is the real solution to this mess for the government. Then, the other states could change their local laws to opt in or the others to opt out.
Ah, but this is way to simple for the government.....
obg
|