View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-10-2007, 08:19 PM
Clever Nickname Clever Nickname is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Default Re: which is easier, full tilt or pstars?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At the 200NL level I've found Full Tilt to be way, way, way fishier than stars.

[/ QUOTE ]
There are fish at 200NL? I play 25NL on FT and all I run into are aggro 19/15s! Seriously though, I haven't played on Stars for a while but I remember when moving to FT (10NL) I noticed a generally higher level of aggression there.

I guess a fish at 25NL is someone like 70/30 and a fish at 200NL is someone who just plays badly postflop, regardless of the stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a good number of players who are awful both pre and postflop at the 200NL level. Granted, there are also more good regulars to deal with as well, but there's a surprising number of 50/30 and 40/2 players at this level, and a good number of the players with decent preflop stats are still pretty bad postflop.
Reply With Quote