[guids]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you idiots do realize that the dad asked most likely the dumbest person in the place, the hostess, if they could do it. she didnt know the policy, and was corrected by the owner. end of story. and seriously, if the hostess said that they dont sing happy birthday do you think the dad is going to pile everyone back in the car and go somewhere else?

[/ QUOTE ] It doesn't matter what the dad would have done if the hostess said this or that. She made an agreement with this guy, he would get dessert and a happy birthday song, the restaurant would get money. This is a normal agreement that hostesses make and one the dad had every reason to believe this particular hostess was authorized to make. The restaurant has to honor it if they want any right to expect the dad to honor his part of the agreement.

Would you also think it was fine if they ordered blueberry pie for dessert, and then the restaurant served and expected them to pay for banana splits in stead? I'm sure they wouldn't have gotten up and gone to another restaurant if the hostess had told them they were out of blueberry pies.

[/ QUOTE ]


what the [censored] are you talking about. the restaurant has to honor the agreement if they expect the dad to honor his? what agreement? are you saying the dad sholdnt have to pay for dinner? wtf are you rambling about? and the whole dessert analogy is super retarded. dessert = money, singing happy birthday = nothing of any monetary value.