[1huskerfan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how are people still defending cake in this situation? jesus christ.

[/ QUOTE ]

While I wouldn't defend Cake at this stage - I wouldn't jump all over them either. We had people saying "I am never going to deposit there!" after the very first post, which(no offense to Reef), was a very one-sided story, backed up by only some small fragments of the actual correspondence.

From the looks of things Cake didn't handle things correctly, but most sensible people would reserve judgment till we see (1) the full correspondence, and/or (2) Cakes side of the story.

[/ QUOTE ]

that's the thing though. reef could have threatened to shoot the cs guys mom and do a million charge backs. cake still handled the situation poorly.

[/ QUOTE ]

With the exception of the CS rep's tact, I don't see anthing wrong with what Cake did. Reef through a tantrum and they told hime they didn't want his business, AND refunded his money. Warning others in the industry of his tactics and threats, by placing him on the lists mentioned, is he right thing to do. To imply this is somehow violating his rights is comical at best. Your actions and behavior will always come around to bite you in the ass, whether you are a 'high volume respected player' or not.