[guaranteedBluff]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
game selection can mean how tough the games are. Most people think the FTP games are tougher than stars. Part of the reason is that 2/3 of cardrunners members play there.

Also, im sure that really really good players love being able to express whether they are normal, happy, sad, or confused.

[/ QUOTE ]

true. i'd be interested in seeing a comparison of average pot, players/flop for stars and ftp. here are the numbers for ftp >100k hands at 1/2:

avg pot = $28.08
avg saw flop = 24.30%

anyone wanna chime in with stars numbers?

[/ QUOTE ]


A comparison is meaningless unless the data is collected at the same time(s) of day on each.

-Narena.

[/ QUOTE ]

that is assuming the trends from day-night are different between the two sites. (which i doubt)

but still, you are right that the comparison would be more telling broken up into sections of the day.

edit: i should note, the numbers i quoted above are from a fairly evenly spread range of times throughout the day and night.