View Single Post
  #45  
Old 06-13-2007, 08:25 AM
Prodigy54321 Prodigy54321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 5,326
Default Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's theorem ftw

[/ QUOTE ]

Pascal's Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_theorem

You are talking about Pascal's wager
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager

[/ QUOTE ]

obv mistake. nh.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah I was wondering about that too. I looked up Pascal's Theorem and was wondering "WTF? What does that have to do with anything?"

But yeah, definitely Pascal's Wager FTW.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's wager is bogus

[/ QUOTE ]

word