[UATrewqaz]

Good post, thanks for the info, and I believe it all 100% too.

The issue with Brandi vs. Newhouse and the 30K has to do with the definition of "theft"

Although he agreed to let her play on his account (which everyone agrees was a horribly stupid thing to do) she agreed to only play certain stakes or accept a certain loss. She broke the terms of their oral agreement/contract, ie which stakes/games she could play.

If you loan me your car for me to go to the grocery store and the grocery store only, and I take it on a cross country trip for days and end up driving it off a pier into the Atlantic ocean you're probably gonna want restitution for it. I can't just say as an excuse "Well you agreed to let me drive your car so I'm not responsible."