Thread: too aggressive?
View Single Post
  #4  
Old 06-06-2007, 03:34 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: too aggressive?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think it looks good.

My question is on the river though.

What do you do if:
1) MP3 raises; Button calls
2) MP3 raises; Button folds
3) MP3 calls; Button raises

Is the pot big enough to call these raises here? I think I let 1) and 3) go but call 2). This could all be leaks though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Is it bad form to ask additional questions in someone else's thread or is the answer to this just obvious to everyone but me?

[/ QUOTE ]

not at all, these questions are why these forums exist.

and this is why I hate bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]

C'mon, Buzz, seriously...are these decisions MORE difficult than what to do if you check and:

1) MP3 bets; Button calls
2) MP3 bets; Button folds
3) MP3 checks; Button bets

I'd say that any of the 3 scenarios we have to deal with are easier than 1 & 3 above. 2 above is probably the easiest of all, but we don't play poker for a 1 in 6 chance of an easy play, do we?

(Not to mention what you'll do to your cat when the river checks through and you get shown QQ and AdTx.)
Reply With Quote