Re: Obvious Collusion at the Canterbury Club (Long -Cliff Notes at bot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You'd have to play a ridiculous amount of hours or get absurdly lucky to make a living playing at this limit.
[/ QUOTE ]
that or just be good at poker.
[/ QUOTE ]
yeah... but even a winning player who books a win at 2 out of 3 or even 3 out of 4 sessions,
[/ QUOTE ]
this statement shows a fundamental lack of understanding about being a pro. 'book a win'????
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah... I understand the hourly rate of return.. one big bet an hour... blah blah blah
however, in a very aggressive game like that... I think you have to have a certain standard deviation threshold... a max up and/or down for a day / session that you are ready / willing to reach.
That's what I'm referring to you.
Would you be willing to disclose what your hourly rate is in that game? I'm sure you keep great stats.
[/ QUOTE ]
w
t
f
?
and yes I log every session of every game I play and no I will not say my winrate in that game.
[/ QUOTE ]
Will you at least divulge your standard deviation quit threshold? Every poker player has one.
|