Re: Obvious Collusion at the Canterbury Club (Long -Cliff Notes at bot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i don't even know where to begin with this BS, but I will start with this statement....
[ QUOTE ]
HOWEVER, if he hasn't in the past brought up the fact that there is OBVIOUS collusion in that 30-60 game... then he is either involved or has decided not to let anyone know.
[/ QUOTE ]
you are making a very serious accusation here. if you have any evidence, then either bring it or shut the [censored] up.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree Bob. However your tone is a bit on the guilty-defensive side.
He already gave plenty of evidence. Someone 3 betting and then folding to a single bet is HIGHLY suspicious.
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't recall that hand, but i know the 2 guys he is talking about. i have played a great deal with them both. they are not a team. period.
and being friends with people in the game means nothing. i play HARDER against my friends than anyone else and am CONSTANTLY [censored] with them/putting them in bad spots.
the guy who made this post limped K6s utg in a 9 handed game. he clearly doesn't know much about limit hold'em.
|